![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1 | |
|
Easy Drive Forum Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 355
|
Drunk driving laws need major reform: Lawyers
Drunk driving laws need major reform: Lawyers In Mumbai, Alistair Pareira gets 180 days for killing seven people in a drunken-driving episode. In the US, Paris Hilton gets 45 days for violating parole conditions, which included a suspended licence, after being arrested last year for driving under the influence of alcohol. There is no link between the two incidents and yet there is. The long arm of the law works more effectively in one country and there are no guesses which one. In India, given the high death rate due to road accidents, there is a growing demand from activists and legal experts for a more stringent law for driving under influence (DUI) of alcohol or DUI offences, as it is referred to in most Western countries. Maharashtra alone recorded over 10,000 road fatalities in 2006. The lack of stringent laws is best illustrated by the Alistair Pareira case. In the UK, for instance, Pareira would have attracted a maximum of 14 years imprisonment, an unlimited fine, and a cancellation of his driving licence for two years. The sessions judge did say that Pareira was driving carelessly and was drunk but let him off on the more serious offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder which attracts 10 years, and instead sent him to jail for six months. Laws are far more stringent for DUI offences in most developed countries, where rash driving is treated as a serious crime. In Australia, for instance, the police have powers to stop motorists randomly and subject him or her to a breath analyzer without reason. In the US and UK though the police have to give reasons for the breath analyzer test. In India, the breath analyzer is only occasionally used (traffic police in most cities are not equipped with new machines); and a new law on confiscation of a driving licence if any one fails the test is only being contemplated. The incidence of drunken driving in the West has reduced as a result of tough laws, which set an example. For instance, barely days ago, prosecutors in Los Angeles had filed misdemeanour charges, including drunk driving, against rapper-actress Eve over a traffic accident in Hollywood. Eve was a 2001 Grammy award winner along with Gwen Stefani. In most countries, including India, the permissible blood alcohol limit is 0.05 %—it is lower in case of learners and certain other categories in other countries—and Eve’s test showed up 0.08. She faces a maximum penalty of six months in jail and a $1,000 fine. But a statutory minimum sentence would include a minimum of three years probation, a fine of at least $390 and an alcohol education program. The world over, drunken driving is an offence that also attracts demerit points and a graded punishment that could see the driver losing his licence. In comparison, in India, punishment for the first offence for ‘driving under influence’ of alcohol is a maximum sentence of six months or a fine of Rs 2,000. If a driver gets caught again within three years, he could attract up to two years in jail or a Rs 3,000 fine. These measures, as they stand, are clearly ineffective, say experts. Legal delays ensure that the jail sentence is often an empty threat, and the prescribed fine is barely a deterrent. Fatal accidents caused by a drunk driver are not even classified as a separate offence under Indian law although Maharashtra has woken up to the dangers of drinking and driving and is now stepping on the gas to make fatal accidents or accidents resulting in grievous injuries a non-bailable offence punishable by at least seven years in jail. Experts say what is needed is a graded system of punishment for drunk driving cases not involving accidents, as in the UK, Australia, and Switzerland. “The need is to ensure that no person who has consumed alcohol above permissible limits be allowed to drive,” said Mahesh Jethmalani who adds that the idea of punishment is not and should not be vendetta, the aim is to reform people. He suggests a point system for repeat offences and revocation of licences. The only practical difficulty with this idea is that the traffic records are still not computerised and hence it is difficult to track the offender and the multiple offences. Noted defence counsel V R Manohar too says that laws in India need to be amended and fast. GRADED PUNISHMENT Quote:
Date Of Publish: 07-May-07
__________________
Nothing is fool-proof to a talented fool. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 62
|
Yes more strict laws not only for drunken driving also for other traffic rules violations are mandatory through out the country same as new traffic fines had been implemented in Delhi since 9Apr’07.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cochin
Age: 28
Posts: 2
|
The drunken drivers not only take their own life, but others also.
Shame on them ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.
Posts: 18
|
The difficulty with implementing all these penalties, like demerit points, cancellation of licence in our country is how to track these things. It is a well known fact that many of the drivers/riders haven't seen a licence in their life, though they may be riding for the past 40 years! And it is very easy to get a licence. There was a reported case of a man without legs getting a car driving licence!
Then who is to impose these penalties? Our toothless, corrupt traffic police! It is said that they pay money to powers that be to be posted in lucrative areas, same as posting to anti-prohibition wing which is lucrative. There are people who think that only document they need while driving is the legal tender, that too in 10s! There are people who say that penalties will not be effective. Educating the public is the best solution. But as the famous words of wisdom goes 'you can wake up a person who sleeps, but not one who pretends to be sleeping'! So what is the solution? Political will(read-no vote bank politics) and non-interference by politicians for some sustained time will show people that the government means business! But who is listening? Clinking of glasses drown out everything.
__________________
Is it only impotent rage? |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Age: 24
Posts: 1
|
A significant number of traffic deaths and serious accidents are caused by alcohol or drug-impaired drivers, although many of them survive the incidents without serious injury. This has led all 50 states to establish strict laws concerning drivers who operate vehicles while intoxicated.A DUI charge is very serious The consequences of a conviction are life-altering,If you have been charged with a DUI you should seek legal help at once from DUI Lawyers .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Drive drunk, you may lose licence on spot | manoj | Delhi | 8 | 03-04-07 05:04 PM |
| Driving by minors, a major problem | manoj | General Discussion | 3 | 30-01-07 03:52 PM |
| Car won’t start if you are drunk | manoj | General Discussion | 0 | 21-11-06 10:07 AM |
| Tougher laws don’t always deter drunken driving | manoj | General Discussion | 0 | 14-11-06 11:08 AM |
| The laws of Traffic-o-dynamics | vinod | General Discussion | 0 | 21-09-06 12:30 PM |